[Differences among renin-angiotensin system inhibitor drugs in prognosis of hypertense patients with COVID-19]. / Diferencias entre fármacos inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina en pacientes hipertensos ingresados por COVID-19.

Introduction: Concerns have been raised about Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients with COVID-19. Although recent trials have proved its security, evidence regarding intrinsic differences between RASi is lacking, especially in patients with arterial hypertension. Our objective was to analyse the prognosis of hypertense patients who received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs) and were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Materials and methods: 392 consecutive patients with hypertension and COVID-19 were analyse. Incidence of the combined event (death or mechanical ventilation need) was the primary endpoint. Secondary, incidence of each event and time to event were analysed. Results: 155 received ACEi and 237 ARBs. During the hospitalization, the combined event was observed in the 31,6 % of patients. No differences were observed between those previously treated with ACEi and ARBs (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). In the survival analysis, no differences were observed regarding time to combined event (p = 0.91). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), as well as the need of mechanical ventilation (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusions: The type of RASi was not associated with in-hospital major events in patients with arterial hypertension hospitalized due to COVID-19.

Introducción: Han surgido dudas sobre la seguridad de los fármacos inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina (SRA) en pacientes con enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Aunque estudios recientes han demostrado la seguridad de este grupo de fármacos, la evidencia sobre la comparativa de los diferentes fármacos inhibidores del SRA es escasa, sobre todo en pacientes hipertensos. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar el pronóstico de los pacientes hipertensos tratados con inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) o antagonistas del receptor de angiotensina II (ARA II) que presentaron COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron 582 pacientes hipertensos con COVID-19. Se registró la incidencia del evento combinado de muerte o necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) durante la hospitalización. De forma secundaria, se analizó la incidencia de eventos de manera independiente y se realizó un análisis de supervivencia para analizar el tiempo hasta los eventos. Resultados: 155 pacientes recibían tratamiento previo con IECA y 237 con ARA II. Durante la hospitalización por COVID-19, se observó una incidencia del evento combinado del 31.6%. No se detectaron diferencias entre los pacientes que recibían tratamiento con IECA y los tratados con ARA II (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). En el análisis de supervivencia, no se hallaron diferencias en el tiempo hasta el evento combinado (p = 0.91). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue similar en ambos grupos (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), así como la necesidad de VMI (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusiones: El tipo de inhibidor del SRA no se asoció a diferencias pronósticas significativas entre los pacientes hipertensos ingresados con COVID-19.

Análisis de la relación entre los inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina y la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados por infección respiratoria COVID-19 / Comparative analysis between the use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection

INTRODUCCIÓN: La presencia de hipertensión arterial se asocia con peor pronóstico en pacientes con COVID-19, y se ha sugerido que el uso de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina puede influir en el pronóstico de los pacientes. MÉTODOS: Registro observacional de 921 pacientes consecutivos ingresados por infección respiratoria COVID-19 entre el 1 de marzo y el 30 abril de 2020 en el Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real. Se registraron datos clínicos y analíticos, intervenciones terapéuticas y desarrollo de eventos durante el ingreso hospitalario. RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad fue de 78 años y el 59,2% tenían hipertensión arterial. Aunque el perfil clínico fue más desfavorable en el grupo de pacientes con prescripción previa de IECA o ARA2 respecto al resto, los primeros presentaron menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado (mortalidad total o necesidad de soporte ventilatorio invasivo). Asimismo, el empleo previo al ingreso o durante el mismo de estos fármacos mostró un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva. En el análisis de supervivencia no se observó mayor riesgo de presentar más precozmente ninguno de los eventos registrados. CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción previa al ingreso por infección respiratoria COVID-19 de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina se asoció a un menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado y a un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection, so concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This is an observational study of 921 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection to Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 78 years, and 59.2% of patients had a history of hypertension. Patients with previous treatment with RAS inhibitor (42.4%) showed lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation). Treatment with RAS inhibitor (both outpatient treatment and during hospitalization) had neither effect on mortality nor need for invasive ventilation. There were no differences in time-to-event analysis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitor treatment prior to admission in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection was associated with lower risk of the primary composite endpoint and did not show neither impact on mortality nor need for invasive mechanical ventilation, even if these drugs were prescribed during hospitalization

Comparative analysis between the use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection, so concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This is an observational study of 921 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection to Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 78 years, and 59.2% of patients had a history of hypertension. Patients with previous treatment with RAS inhibitor (42.4%) showed lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation). Treatment with RAS inhibitor (both outpatient treatment and during hospitalization) had neither effect on mortality nor need for invasive ventilation. There were no differences in time-to-event analysis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitor treatment prior to admission in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection was associated with lower risk of the primary composite endpoint and did not show neither impact on mortality nor need for invasive mechanical ventilation, even if these drugs were prescribed during hospitalization.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La presencia de hipertensión arterial se asocia con peor pronóstico en pacientes con COVID-19, y se ha sugerido que el uso de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina puede influir en el pronóstico de los pacientes. MÉTODOS: Registro observacional de 921 pacientes consecutivos ingresados por infección respiratoria COVID-19 entre el 1 de marzo y el 30 abril de 2020 en el Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real. Se registraron datos clínicos y analíticos, intervenciones terapéuticas y desarrollo de eventos durante el ingreso hospitalario. RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad fue de 78 años y el 59,2% tenían hipertensión arterial. Aunque el perfil clínico fue más desfavorable en el grupo de pacientes con prescripción previa de IECA o ARA2 respecto al resto, los primeros presentaron menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado (mortalidad total o necesidad de soporte ventilatorio invasivo). Asimismo, el empleo previo al ingreso o durante el mismo de estos fármacos mostró un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva. En el análisis de supervivencia no se observó mayor riesgo de presentar más precozmente ninguno de los eventos registrados. CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción previa al ingreso por infección respiratoria COVID-19 de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina se asoció a un menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado y a un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva.

Impact of Treatment with Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns have been raised about the possible harmfulness of angiotensin-converter enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and aldosterone receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with COVID-19. However, few data from a European population have been published, especially from hypertensive patients. AIM: To study the association between ACEi or ARB treatments and major adverse outcomes during hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We studied 545 consecutive hypertensive patients admitted to our institution due to COVID-19 with respiratory involvement. We analysed the incidence of combined event (death or mechanical ventilatory support) during hospitalisation, as well as the time to independent events. RESULTS: 188 (34.5%) patients presented the combined endpoint. 182 (33.4%) patients died, and 21 (3.9%) needed mechanical ventilatory support. Patients with previous treatment with ACEi or ARB presented similar incidence of the combined endpoint during hospitalisation (31.6% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.08), with a lower all-cause mortality rate (30.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.03) compared with those without prior treatment. Use of ACEi or ARB was not independently associated with lower incidence of the combined endpoint [Adjusted OR 0.675 (95% CI 0.298-1.528; p = 0.146)], but it was associated with lower mortality [Adjusted OR 0.550 (95% CI 0.304-0.930; p = 0.047)]. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ACEi or ARB was associated with less incidence of all-cause death during hospitalisation among hypertensive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection.

[Comparative analysis between the use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection]. / Análisis de la relación entre los inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina y la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados por infección respiratoria COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection, so concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This is an observational study of 921 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection to Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 78years, and 59.2% of patients had a history of hypertension. Patients with previous treatment with RAS inhibitor (42.4%) showed lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation). Treatment with RAS inhibitor (both outpatient treatment and during hospitalization) had neither effect on mortality nor need for invasive ventilation. There were no differences in time-to-event analysis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitor treatment prior to admission in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection was associated with lower risk of the primary composite endpoint and did not show neither impact on mortality nor need for invasive mechanical ventilation, even if these drugs were prescribed during hospitalization.

Fibrilación auricular en los pacientes en hemodiálisis en Andalucía. Prevalencia, perfil clínico y manejo terapéutico / Atrial fibrillation in patients on haemodialysis in Andalusia. Prevalence, clinical profile and therapeutic management

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es un importante problema social y sanitario. Existe una amplia variación en la prevalencia de esta arritmia en los estudios que analizan a los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD). OBJETIVO: Investigar la prevalencia, perfil clínico y manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con FA en HD en Andalucía. MÉTODOS: Solicitamos al sistema sanitario público de Andalucía el número de pacientes que estaban siendo tratados con HD. Pedimos a los nefrólogos responsables de todos los centros hospitalarios y extrahospitalarios de 5 de las 8 provincias de Andalucía que realizaran un electrocardiograma y cumplimentaran un cuestionario en pacientes seleccionados por un muestreo aleatorizado simple. RESULTADOS: Estaban en HD 2.348 pacientes en las 5provincias incluidas. El tamaño muestral estimado fue 285 pacientes. Obtuvimos electrocardiograma e información de 252 (88,4%). Edad media 65,3 ± 16 años; 40,9% mujeres. Tenían FA 63 pacientes (25%). De estos, 36 (14,3%) tenían FA en el registro realizado y en el resto había sido documentada previamente. En el análisis multivariante, mayor edad (OR: 1,071; IC 95%: 1,036-1,107; p = 0,000) y mayor tiempo en HD (OR: 1,009; IC 95%:1,004-1,014; p = 0,000) se asociaron de forma independiente con la FA. De los pacientes con FA, el 41,3% estaban en tratamiento anticoagulante en el momento del estudio y el 41,2% con antiagregantes. CONCLUSIONES: La FA en las unidades de diálisis es un importante hallazgo. Establecer la relación riesgo-beneficio del tratamiento anticoagulante constituye un auténtico reto. Son necesarios ensayos clínicos bien diseñados para establecer el uso racional del tratamiento antitrombótico

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents an important social and healthcare problem. There is wide variability in the prevalence of this arrhythmia in studies analysing patients on haemodialysis (HD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, clinical profile and therapeutic management of patients with AF on HD in Andalusia. METHODS: We asked the public healthcare system of Andalusia to provide us with the number of patients who were being treated with HD. We asked attending nephrologists from all hospital and outpatient centres in 5 of the 8 Andalusian provinces to perform an electrocardiogram and to fill out a questionnaire on patients selected by simple random sampling. RESULTS: A total of 2,348 patients were being treated with HD in the 5provinces included in the study. The estimated sample size was 285 patients. We obtained an electrocardiogram and information from 252 patients (88.4%); mean age 65.3 ± 16 years; 40.9% women. Sixty-three patients (25%) had AF. Of these, 36 (14.3%) had AF in the recorded ECG and in the rest it had been documented previously. In the multivariate analysis, older age (OR: 1.071; 95% CI: 1.036-1.107; P = 0.000) and greater time on HD (OR: 1.009; 95% CI: 1.004-1.014; P = 0.000) were independently associated with the presence of AF. Of the patients with AF, 41.3% were on anticoagulant treatment at the time of the study; and 41.2% were on antiplatelet agents. CONCLUSIONS: AF in dialysis units is an important finding. Establishing the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant treatment constitutes a real challenge. Well-designed clinical trials are pivotal in order to define the rational use of antithrombotic drugs

Atrial fibrillation in patients on haemodialysis in Andalusia. Prevalence, clinical profile and therapeutic management. / Fibrilación auricular en los pacientes en hemodiálisis en Andalucía. Prevalencia, perfil clínico y manejo terapéutico.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents an important social and healthcare problem. There is wide variability in the prevalence of this arrhythmia in studies analysing patients on haemodialysis (HD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, clinical profile and therapeutic management of patients with AF on HD in Andalusia. METHODS: We asked the public healthcare system of Andalusia to provide us with the number of patients who were being treated with HD. We asked attending nephrologists from all hospital and outpatient centres in 5 of the 8 Andalusian provinces to perform an electrocardiogram and to fill out a questionnaire on patients selected by simple random sampling. RESULTS: A total of 2,348 patients were being treated with HD in the 5provinces included in the study. The estimated sample size was 285 patients. We obtained an electrocardiogram and information from 252 patients (88.4%); mean age 65.3±16 years; 40.9% women. Sixty-three patients (25%) had AF. Of these, 36 (14.3%) had AF in the recorded ECG and in the rest it had been documented previously. In the multivariate analysis, older age (OR: 1.071; 95% CI: 1.036-1.107; P=0.000) and greater time on HD (OR: 1.009; 95% CI: 1.004-1.014; P=0.000) were independently associated with the presence of AF. Of the patients with AF, 41.3% were on anticoagulant treatment at the time of the study; and 41.2% were on antiplatelet agents. CONCLUSIONS: AF in dialysis units is an important finding. Establishing the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant treatment constitutes a real challenge. Well-designed clinical trials are pivotal in order to define the rational use of antithrombotic drugs.

Resolution of left ventricular thrombus by rivaroxaban.

Intracardiac thrombus is a potentially life-threatening condition, with a high risk of embolic complications. Although vitamin K antagonists have been traditionally used for the treatment of intracardiac thrombus, they have relevant disadvantages that limit their use. Rivaroxaban is a once daily oral anticoagulant, currently indicated for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. We present the case of a 78-year-old man with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure and creatinine clearance of 40 ml/min, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day as the patient had very difficult access to hematologic controls. The transthoracic echocardiogram showed dilated left ventricle, severe left ventricular dysfunction and two images of thrombus, which disappeared after 4 weeks of treatment with rivaroxaban. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported regarding the resolution of left ventricular thrombosis with rivaroxaban.

[Asymptomatic infection by influenza AH1N1 virus in healthcare workers: MARBEGRIP study, preliminary results]. / Infección asintomática por el virus influenza H1N1 (2009) en personal sanitario: Estudio Marbegrip. Resultados preliminares.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of asymptomatic individuals infected by influenza AH1N1v varies depending on the studies. Health personnel were exposed to the AH1N1v virus due to their professional activity, thus an high seroprevalence to the virus could be expected in the absence of symptomatology. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic individuals serologically positive for influenza AH1N1v virus. METHODS: A cohort based prospective study on hospital staff was proposed according to an hypothetic decreasing gradient of exposure to the virus, from emergency personnel to medical and surgical areas, and auxiliary staff other than emergency personnel. Serum sample from each participant was taken in September-October, 2009, November-December, 2009, and in April-May, 2010; and a health questionnaire was simultaneously filled out. Specific antibodies against influenza AH1N1v were detected by hemagglutination inhibition test. Eighteen hospitals (1,371 individuals) participated in the study. RESULTS: Health questionnaire and serological results from four hospitals are available. A variable proportion of non vaccinated individuals showed positive serology (5.6-83%). Only 19.4% of subjects received vaccine, with a variable rate of positive serology (18.8-64.7%). Positive serology was significantly lower in non medical participants. In addition, vaccine coverage was higher in medical personnel than in the rest of professional categories. CONCLUSIONS: There was a variable percentage of influenza AH1N1v seropositive individuals who had not suffered clinical symptomatology. This serological study detects differences on vaccine efficacy.

Infección asintomática por el virus influenza H1N1 (2009) en personal sanitario. Estudio marbegrip. Resultados preliminares / Asymptomatic infection by (H1N1) 2009 virus in health care workers. MARBEGRIP study. Preliminar results

Fundamento: La proporción de individuos asintomáticos que se infectan por gripe AH1N1v varía según las series. Los sanitarios están expuestos al virus de la gripe AH1N1v por su condición laboral, por lo que cabe esperar una prevalencia elevada de individuos con serología positiva sin presentar cuadro clínico asociado. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de sanitarios asintomáticos con serología positiva para el virus de la gripe AH1N1v. Métodos: Se propuso un estudio prospectivo de cohortes en personal hospitalario en función de un hipotético gradiente decreciente de exposición al virus: personal de urgencias, área médica, área quirúrgica y celadores no de urgencias. Se extrajo sangre de los participantes en septiembre- octubre de 2009, noviembre-diciembre de 2009 y en abril-mayo de 2010, junto con la extracción se rellenaba un cuestionario de salud. Se ofreció la participación voluntaria a los miembros de los diferentes servicios. En sangre se procedió a determinar anticuerpos específicos frente al virus de la gripe AH1N1v por medio de inhibición de la hemaglutinación. Participaron 18 hospitales con un total de 1.371 participantes. Resultados: Se dispone de cuestionario de salud y de resultados serológicos de cuatro hospitales. Se observó una proporción variable de sanitarios asintomáticos con serología positiva sin haber sido vacunados (entre el 5,6% y el 83%). Sólo se vacunaron un 19,4% de los sanitarios, con un porcentaje de serologías positivas también variable (entre un 18,8% y 64,7%). El porcentaje de serologías positivas fue significativamente menor entre los celadores y el resto de categorías profesionales. La vacunación fue mayor entre los médicos que en el resto de estamentos profesionales. Conclusiones: Existe un porcentaje variable de individuos con serología positiva sin haber sufrido síntomas, con claras diferencias geográficas. Se observan también diferencias en la efectividad vacunal en términos serológicos(AU)

Background: The proportion of asymptomatic individuals infected by influenza AH1N1v varies depending on the studies. Health personnel were exposed to the AH1N1v virus due to their professional activity, thus an high seroprevalence to the virus could be expected in the absence of symptomatology. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic individuals serologically positive for influenza AH1N1v virus. Methods: Acohort based prospective study on hospital staff was proposed according to an hypothetic decreasing gradient of exposure to the virus, from emergency personnel to medical and surgical areas, and auxiliary staff other than emergency personnel. Serum sample from each participant was taken in September-October, 2009, November-December, 2009, and in April-May, 2010; and a health questionnaire was simultaneously filled out. Specific antibodies against influenza AH1N1v were detected by hemagglutination inhibition test. Eighteen hospitals (1,371 individuals) participated in the study. Results: Health questionnaire and serological results from four hospitals are available.Avariable proportion of non vaccinated individuals showed positive serology (5.6-83%). Only 19.4% of subjects received vaccine, with a variable rate of positive serology (18.8-64.7%). Positive serology was significantly lower in non medical participants. In addition, vaccine coverage was higher in medical personnel than in the rest of professional categories Conclusions: There was a variable percentage of influenza AH1N1v seropositive individuals who had not suffered clinical symptomatology. This serological study detects differences on vaccine efficacy(AU)